Background
Zero-base budgeting (ZBB) is a method an organization uses to prepare its budget by starting from a baseline of zero, rather than using the previous year’s budget as a starting point. Every department’s expenses must be justified and approved for inclusion in the new period’s budget.
Historical Context
Zero-base budgeting was developed in the 1970s by Peter Pyhrr, an accounting manager at Texas Instruments. It gained popularity in both the public and private sectors during that time. U.S. President Jimmy Carter notably adopted ZBB as a tool to control federal expenditure. However, its implementation has been mixed due to the practical challenges organizations face.
Definitions and Concepts
ZBB involves a complete review and justification of all organizational functions and expenses. Unlike traditional budgeting, each new period begins by examining the necessities and costs from a zero base. The process primarily includes the following components:
- Objective Identification: Define organizational goals for the new period.
- Alternative Strategies: Develop alternative methods to achieve those goals.
- Decision Package: Each organizational component presents its budgeting needs from zero.
- Review and Approval: Management comprehensively reviews and prioritizes these packages.
Major Analytical Frameworks
Classical Economics
Though ZBB is not directly discussed in classical economics literature, the idea of justifying expenditures aligns with fundamental economic principles of efficiency and rational allocation of resources.
Neoclassical Economics
Neoclassical perspectives value marginal analysis, which contrasts with ZBB’s fundamental review approach. Yet, ZBB’s potential for optimizing allocation aligns well with the principles of market efficiency advocated by neoclassical theorists.
Keynesian Economic
From a Keynesian viewpoint, public sector spending and investment decisions are crucial for economic stability. ZBB is demanding in procedural terms, making Keynesians prefer traditional increment-based budgeting methods that are quicker and more straightforward during fiscal planning periods.
Marxian Economics
Marxian theorists focus on resource allocation and the class-based outcomes of such decisions. Within organizations, ZBB forces a thorough evaluation of resource allocation reflecting Marxist interest in how expenses serve labor and capital.
Institutional Economics
ZBB encourages scrutiny and a reevaluation of institutional processes, which institutional economics sees positively as it aligns with their emphasis on the examination of how institutions affect economic behavior.
Behavioral Economics
Behavioral economists may analyze ZBB in terms of decision-making processes, cognitive biases, and resistance due to change aversion from traditional increment-based budgeting.
Post-Keynesian Economics
Post-Keynesians focus on the potential societal impacts of fiscal decisions emphasizing heterodox approaches over conventional financial strictures. ZBB might offer methodological tools aligned to these ends by offering more dynamically justifiable budgetary frameworks.
Austrian Economics
For Austrian economists, emphasizing qualitative over quantitative analysis, ZBB’s granular approach to justifying every expense might resonate, though they critique it for potentially undervaluing the entrepreneurs who drive budget efficiency.
Development Economics
Evaluating ZBB through a development economics lens highlights how it impacts non-governmental organizations and developing country administrations committed to reforming their financial administration for growth.
Monetarism
Monetarists’ focus on controlling money supply could intersect with ZBB through the accountability and more controlled, justifiable budgeting ZBB promotes.
Comparative Analysis
When comparing zero-base budgeting with traditional incremental budgeting, the key difference rests in ZBB’s thoroughness versus incremental budgeting’s continuity. ZBB demands rejustification of each financial need, whereas incremental budgeting focuses on adjustments based on existing budgets. This can lead to either more efficient allocation using ZBB or lead to rigidity and resistance due to its comprehensiveness.
Case Studies
Case studies where ZBB has been implemented can show insights into both its success and challenges. Some public sectors in the USA in the 1970s found ZBB initially beneficial but struggled with the administrative load. Companies like Texas Instruments, where ZBB originated, have seen varying success.
Suggested Books for Further Studies
- “Zero Base Budgeting: A Practical Management Tool for Evaluating Expenses” by Peter Pyhrr
- “Implementing Budgetary Change in the Public Sector” by Gary Cokins
Related Terms with Definitions
- Incremental Budgeting: A budgeting method where new budgets are based on slight adjustments from the previous period’s.
- Performance Budgeting: Budgeting that ties future funding to the performance of certain measurable indicators.
- Cost-Benefit Analysis: A systematic approach to evaluating the pros and cons of different budgetary decisions.
This structured explanation covers the fundamentals, historical influence, diverse economic perspectives, comparative utility, and educational resources associated with zero-base budgeting.
