Background
Dynamic inconsistency refers to the phenomenon where decisions that seem optimal in the present may no longer be optimal when the moment to execute these decisions arrives in the future. This results from changes in circumstances or preferences over time.
Historical Context
The concept of dynamic inconsistency has gained traction in different fields of economics, including game theory and behavioral economics. The term “time inconsistency” is frequently used interchangeably with dynamic inconsistency, especially in behavioral economics contexts.
Definitions and Concepts
Dynamic inconsistency occurs when a decision-maker’s optimal plan changes over time. This can be due to evolving preferences, new information, or changes in external circumstances. Essentially, what is optimal at one point might not remain so later, leading to a shift in strategy or decision.
Example
Consider a government that initially announces a tight monetary policy to keep inflation expectations low and convince workers to accept modest wage increases. Once workers have agreed to these wage constraints, the government may find it advantageous to switch to a loose monetary policy to stimulate economic output, thereby deviating from its initial plan.
Major Analytical Frameworks
Classical Economics
Classical economists primarily focused on the notion of equilibrium in markets and did not explicitly address issues of dynamic inconsistency.
Neoclassical Economics
In neoclassical economics, models often assume consistent preferences over time, which implicitly neglects the problem of dynamic inconsistency.
Keynesian Economics
Keynesian models, emphasizing the short run, acknowledge changes in circumstances but typically do not focus extensively on dynamic inconsistency.
Marxian Economics
Marxian economics does not deeply engage with the concept of dynamic inconsistency, as its focus is on underlying structural issues in capitalist economies.
Institutional Economics
Institutional economists might explore dynamic inconsistency by analyzing how changing rules and norms affect long-term decision-making within institutions.
Behavioral Economics
In behavioral economics, dynamic inconsistency is often referred to as “time inconsistency” and plays a significant role in understanding how people make decisions that differ from their planned course of action. This involves concepts like present bias and hyperbolic discounting.
Post-Keynesian Economics
Post-Keynesian economists, who emphasize uncertainty and the imperfection of markets, incorporate dynamic inconsistency as part of their critique of standard economic theories.
Austrian Economics
Austrian economists, emphasizing time and individual decision-making, may discuss dynamic inconsistency in the context of how entrepreneurs adapt to changing circumstances.
Development Economics
Development economists may study dynamic inconsistency by examining how government policies evolve and impact long-term development goals.
Monetarism
Monetarists might explore dynamic inconsistency through the inconsistency of long-term monetary policy objectives vs. short-term results, focusing on methods to mitigate such conflicts through rules-based policy.
Comparative Analysis
Dynamic inconsistency can create dilemmas in policy-making, personal finance, and corporate strategy. Comparing different theories highlights a spectrum of approaches to mitigating shift in plans, such as commitment devices, credible policies, and time-consistent strategies.
Case Studies
Case studies include examples like fiscal and monetary policy shifts, changes in corporate strategy, and patterns of individual behaviors that deviate from initial plans.
Suggested Books for Further Studies
- “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by Daniel Kahneman
- “Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics” by Richard H. Thaler
- “Advances in Behavioral Economics” by Colin Camerer, George Loewenstein and Matthew Rabin
Related Terms with Definitions
- Time Inconsistency: Circumstances where preferences change over time, causing deviations from initially planned decisions.
- Present Bias: The tendency to weigh immediate rewards more heavily than future benefits.
- Hyperbolic Discounting: A model describing how individuals disproportionately prefer smaller, immediate rewards over larger, delayed rewards.
